Scottish judges deliver hammer blow to Boris Johnson by ruling Parliament was suspended ILLEGALLY – sparking demands for MPs to be RECALLED as the titanic battle heads for the Supreme Court
- Single judge in Edinburgh previously found suspended parliament was lawful
- But three appeal judges have now overturned that in a setback for Boris Johnson
- The case is set to be appealed at the Supreme Court in London next week
Scottish judges delivered a hammer blow to Boris Johnson today by sensationally ruling Parliament was suspended illegally.
An Edinburgh court decided that prorogation was unlawful because the Prime Minister’s intention had been to ‘stymy’ scrutiny from MPs.
The stage is now set for a titanic showdown at the Supreme Court on Tuesday – with the risk that the monarch could be dragged into the bitter Brexit war.
The judges suggested Mr Johnson misled the Queen about his motivations – concluding he had an ‘improper purpose’.
Remainer politicians who brought the case claimed that the prorogation of Parliament – which happened in the early hours of Tuesday morning by Royal proclamation – was now null and void.
‘We are calling on Parliament to be recalled immediately,’ said the SNP’s Joanna Cherry.
A UK Government spokesperson said: ‘We are disappointed by today’s decision, and will appeal to the UK Supreme Court.
‘The UK Government needs to bring forward a strong domestic legislative agenda. Proroguing Parliament is the legal and necessary way of delivering this.’
Boris Johnson suffered another setback today as Scottish judges ruled his suspension of Parliament is unlawful. The case is expected to be appealed further at the Supreme Court
Scottish MP Joanna Cherry, pictured with lawyer Jo Maugham called the ruling ‘historic’ and ‘fantastic’
Judge Lord Doherty dismissed a challenge against the planned prorogation at the Court of Session last Wednesday, saying it is for politicians and not the courts to decide.
But a panel of three judges in Edinburgh overturned that decision.
A summary of the judgement said: ‘All three first division judges have decided that the PM’s advice to the HM the Queen is justiciable, that it was motivated by the improper purpose of stymying parliament and that it, and what has followed from it, is unlawful.
‘The court will accordingly make an order declaring that the prime minister’s advice to HM the Queen and the prorogation which followed thereon was unlawful and is thus null and of no effect.’
The case is now set for the Supreme Court in London where it is expected to be heard alongside a similar case brought by campaigner Gina Miller.
Those who brought the case have been quick to celebrate the outcome.
Ms Cherry, one of the Scottish MPs who brought the challenge, tweeted: ‘Huge thanks to all our supporters & our fantastic legal team who have achieved the historic ruling that #prorogation is #unlawful’
Jolyon Maugham QC, the anti-Brexit barrister who was second petitioner in the case, said the Supreme Court would hear the case next week.
He tweeted: ‘We have won. Appeal begins in the Supreme Court on Tuesday.
‘We believe that the effect of the decision is that Parliament is no longer prorogued.
‘I have never been able to contemplate the possibility that the law could be that our sovereign Parliament might be treated as an inconvenience by the Prime Minister.
‘I am pleased that Scotland’s highest court agrees. But ultimately, as has always been the case, it’s the final arbiter’s decision that matters.
‘We will convene again in the Supreme Court next week.’